I don't know if I've mentioned it here, probably not because it is not on my mind much, but the Critter Girl has a birthmark on her back. It is about dime-nickel sized, a cafe au lait mark with 3 small freckles inside it. It has not changed since she was born, which I know because every time she has a bath, I check it and say, "Looks the same!"
Her pediatrician sent us to see a pediatric dermatologist 6 months ago, because I guess there can be a higher rate of malignancy in these kind of birthmarks. Maybe. So the derm she said she wanted to see us in 6 months to re-evaluate. Which happened this week.
The Critter (who now weighs in at 17 lbs 3 oz!!) was all smiles for everyone, so charming that girl. The derm looked at the mark, and said she really didn't think it was the kind that will become cancerous, but for cosmetic reasons she recommended we remove it. She said that it will likely grow with the Critter, so it will be in the same proportion on her back as it is now, as opposed to staying its current size as her back gets bigger. She said it will likely get more freckles, and could become "velvety" and possibly sprout hairs. She said it is best to do this kind of surgery between 6-12 months, when the babies are still somewhat immobile and their skin is very pliable and heals well. It would be done under general anesthesia, although she would not be intubated, it sounds more like the twilight sedation, like in an egg retrieval.
She left it up to us to make the decision of removal or not. She, of course, wanted us to do it.
I should also note that I have a birthmark, a prominent one. I have a port wine stain on my forehead, above my right eye, into my hairline. There was no treatment for post wine stains when I was growing up, so my mom kept me in bangs my entire childhood, but also told me it was no big deal. Which I still fully believe to this day. I don't wear bangs anymore, and frequently wear my hair back in a tight ponytail, birthtmark in plain sight. I honestly forget it is there most of the time. Sure, I could have it lasered off now, but my response to that is "Why?" I sort of like it, it makes me me.
The day after the derm appointment, Mr. P and I talked about what to do. We are both leaning towards not removing the Critter's mark. We are both scared to put her under sedation of general anesthesia for basically a cosmetic procedure. And as Mr. P said, "We can raise her to be a confident girl, and let her make her own decision about it when she gets older." I agreed. But kids can be cruel, and I don't want her being teased or feeling bad about something we could have removed.
Do you think we made the right choice? What say you, oh wise interwebbies?
Repeat: Cold Peace
1 day ago